Is Competitive Play Dead in 6th Ed.? Part 2

I've already answered that in part 1. While that post was more about why I believe that competitive play isn't dead in the new edition of warhammer 40k. This one is more about how I believe it has changed, right at it's roots. 

Click the title for more

Is Competitive Play Dead in 6th Ed.? Part 1

NO. That's right, competitive play is not a thing of the past. Period.

Every army has its competitive builds, and its units that aren't so good. But some people can't get that through their thick skulls. 

Click the title for more.

I Don't Care If You Disagree, I Love Finecast

So what's wrong with that?

just kidding!

That's right I've put it up online. I love Finecast. Send all of your friends who disagree here to have their say (and boost my pageviews). This post came from a culmination of different complaints about Finecast online. The straw that broke the camel's back was the second comment on this post. I am now sick of seeing all of these complaints, so I thought I'd stick up for it.

My Army Should Be Invincible!!

I hate this view on the game. When someone starts whining that some unit or army should be immune to X effects or should have Y statistics and free 2+ invulnerable save. I actually nearly lose faith in our hobby. The prime example is something I saw in the run up to the Eldar release. Rumours of the wraithknight's statistics had surfaced and Bell of Lost Souls held a "for and against" article on it. I nearly threw my computer against the wall. The argument against it centred on him not liking the stats.

Image from Games Workshop